Quantcast
Channel: TidBITS: Comments on Why Apple Defends Encryption
Browsing index pages (27 articles)

Comment from W

Or, you know, maybe uphold a $450 million settlement against Apple in an ebook case. Like, the same day Cook posts his open letter. That kind of pressure?

View Article


Comment from Sally Shears

Yes, it's a small number, on mine it's four bad finger touches. After that, phone requires the passcode.

View Article


Comment from Jose Jimenez

Do people really believe that Apple is not cooperating fully with the US government (and other governments) when it comes to providing Apple customer device data? Any claims otherwise by Apple are just...

View Article

Comment from DJ

Great perspectives in this blog, thanks Rich…It’s hard not to view this court order as a follow up to the technology leaders with the White House over encryption last year. When you have a single...

View Article

Comment from B. Jefferson Le Blanc

Benjamin Franklin foresaw this problem over 250 years ago (before the United States was born):"They that can give up essential libertyto obtain a little temporary safetydeserve neither liberty nor...

View Article


Comment from William W Morgan

It is the agreement of Homo sapiens that it is okay to control the life and property of others that is the cause of all our societal problems. It requires individuals to take actions inconsistent with...

View Article

Comment from Simon

It is absolutely different.They have the right to take fingerprints for identification purposes.But forcing your finger onto the Touch ID reader has nothing to do with identification. It's about...

View Article

Comment from Stephen Duncan

They already have the right to take your fingerprints on paper or a scanner. The phone is no different.

View Article


Comment from Adam Engst

Thanks for the kind words!

View Article


Comment from David Byrum

Thanks for an informative and well written article about a timely topic. As others have said I too will be passing this along to friends to read and consider. In this day and age, it is a bit uplifting...

View Article

Comment from Paul

The secret services spying schemes have nothing to do with terrorists or criminals and never have. The shere scale of them shows this. Logic dictates that the most common subject spied upon is the...

View Article

Comment from Simon

I can't really see why one would make such a distinction. The fingerprint is just a more convenient way to enter the passcode. If you cannot compel someone to give their passcode, why should you be...

View Article

Comment from Nicholas Barnard

I was also going to say the same thing. It'd be nice to be able to tweak the requirements for requiring a passcode. AFAIK it's required at startup, when the device hadn't been unlocked for three days,...

View Article


Comment from Nicholas Barnard

Well. If data is encrypted in flight the gov't is more than welcome to issue a warrant to obtain the encrypted data, but it's not decrypted (then potentially encrypted) until it's on a device tha...

View Article

Comment from Tommy Craft

This is a great article, and I can't wait to share it amongst my circle of friends. I did have one quibble though:From the article: "...since you can be compelled to unlock your phone (your passcode...

View Article


Comment from Adam Engst

I'll add a bit about that - the article isn't so much about why back doors are stupid as why Apple is the one defending encryption in public.

View Article

Comment from Curt

Rich,I think it's a strategic error to lump encrypted *storage* and encrypted *communications* into the same discussion. There's a long history of case law (and the 5th amendment) backing up the right...

View Article


Comment from Darren P Meyer

There's also a cultural component. LE has generally had access to things written or recorded, but not informal conversations (for practical reasons—there's no record of them). Now our informal...

View Article

Comment from Norm M

This is the main argument, in my opinion. The bad guys can always encrypt securely, so adding backdoors just removes our privacy for nothing! The article should have made this point! Even if encryption...

View Article

Comment from AnoneemousOne

You know something is wrong when the US Government tries to sell the notion that to defeat terrorist, the first solution is the take privacy and digital security away from Americans.

View Article
Browsing index pages (27 articles)


Latest Images